Web Survey Bibliography
This paper draws on work on a negativity bias in political psychology to better understand - and properly interpret - results from thermometer-score rankings in telephone and online surveys. Thermometer scores are used across a wide range of political surveys to capture individual's attitudes towards groups, politicians and parties. A small body of early work shows, however, (a) that respondents do not systematically regard 50 as the neutral point, and (b) that the range across which individuals rank groups, politicians or parties may reflect either the perception that there are only minor differences between them, or individual-level tendencies to use different ranges to reflect the same underlying beliefs. In short, in spite of some existing research on the matter, it is still difficult to know whether a score of 55 is positive or negative, and whether a 10-point difference reflects a large or small difference in perception. This paper suggests that we can get some leverage on these issues by taking into account the non-linear impact of thermometer scores on other variables; in this case, voting decisions. In short, this work capitalizes on the growing body of work in psychology, economics, and political science suggesting that individuals give more weight to negative information than to positive information. It shows that (a) the impact of thermometer scores on voting decisions is nonlinear, (b) those nonlinearities vary across individuals, and (c) those nonlinearities can be used to both identify the neutral point in thermometer score ratings. Results are interpreted both in light of recent work exploring negativity biases in political behavior, and as they relate to the use of thermometer scores in survey research more generally.
Conference Homepage (abstract)
Web survey bibliography (100)
- Telephone versus Online Survey Modes for Election Studies: Comparing Canadian Public Opinion and Vote...; 2017; Breton, C.; Cutler, F.; Lachance, S.; Mierke-Zatwarnicki, A.
- The 2016 Canadian Census: An Innovative Wave Collection Methodology to Maximize Self-Response and Internet...; 2017; Mathieu, P.
- Gathering Opinions on Depression Information Needs and Preferences: Samples and Opinions in Clinic Versus...; 2017; Bernstein, M. T.; Walker, J. R.; Sexton, K. A.; Katz, A.; Beatie, B. E.
- A test of sample matching using a pseudo-web sample; 2017; Chatrchi, G., Gambino, J.
- Integration of a phone-based household travel survey and a web-based student travel survey; 2016; Verreault, H.; Morency, C.
- A streamlined approach to online linguistic surveys; 2016; Erlewine, M. Y.; Kotek, H.
- Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment; 2016; Guo, Y.; Kopec, J.; Cibere, J.; Li, L. C.; Goldsmith, C. H.
- Mode Effects in Electoral Polls: A Comparative Perspective ; 2016; Durand, C.
- Pitfalls, Potentials, and Ethics of Online Survey Research: LGBTQ and Other Marginalized and Hard-to...; 2016; McInroy, L. B.
- Mail merge can be used to create personalized questionnaires in complex surveys. ; 2016; Taljaard, M.; Chaudhry, S. H.; Brehaut, J. C.; Weijer, C.; Grimshaw, J. M.
- Internet-administered Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaires Compared With Pen and Paper in an...; 2016; Nitikman, M.; Mulpuri, K.; Reilly, C. W.
- What do web survey panel respondents answer when asked “Do you have any other comment?”; 2015; Schonlau, M.
- Explorations in Non - Probability Sampling Using the Web; 2015; Brick, J. M.
- On Bias Adjustments for Web Surveys; 2015; Fan, L.; Lou, W.; Landsman, V.
- Web panel surveys – a challenge for official statistics; 2015; Svensson, J.
- Estimation with Non-probability Surveys and the Question of External Validity; 2015; Dever, J. A.; Valliant, R. L.
- Measurement Properties of Web Surveys; 2015; Tourangeau, R.
- Using Web Panels for Official Statistics; 2014; Bethlehem, J.
- Do Web surveys facilitate reporting less favourable opinions about law enforcement?; 2014; Boivin, R., Cordeau, G.
- Evaluating a Web-based health risk assessment with tailored feedback: What does an expert focus group...; 2014; Vosbergen, S., Mahieu, G. R. Laan, E. K., Kraaijenhagen, R. A., Jaspers, M. W. M., Peek, N.
- Considerations for Conducting Web-Based Survey Research With People Living With Human Immunodeficiency...; 2014; O'Brien, K. K., Solomon, P., Worthington, C., Ibánieez-Carrasco, F., Baxter, L., Nixon, S. A., Baltzer...
- African-American breast cancer survivors’ preferences for various types of physical activity interventions...; 2014; Paxton, R., Nayak, P., Taylor, W., Chang, S., Courneya, K., Schover, L., Hodges, K., Jones, L.
- Measuring Mobile Phone Use: Self-Report Versus Log Data; 2013; Boase, J., Ling, R.
- Does the first impression count? Examining the effect of the welcome screen design on the response rate...; 2013; Haer, R., Meidert, N.
- Recruitment of Sex Buyers: A Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional and Computer Network-Based Approaches...; 2013; Kolar, K., Atchison, C.
- Effects of Gamification on Participation and Data Quality in a Real-World Market Research Domain ; 2013; Cechanowicz, J., Gutwin, C., Brownell, B., Goodfellow, L.
- The Impact of News Photos on Support for Military Action; 2013; Soroka, S.; Loewen, P.; Fournier, P.; Rubenson, D.
- Identifying the real differences of opinion in social media sentiment; 2013; Pettit, A.
- Co-creation with TickiT: Designing and evaluating a clinical eHealth platform for youth; 2013; Whitehouse, S. R.
- Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face...; 2013; Qiu, M., McDougall, D.
- 4 ways mobile research challenges insights pros; 2013; Rajan, B.
- Thoughts on using the new online qualitative tools; 2013; Freund, N. M.
- Optimizing quality of response through adaptive survey designs; 2013; Schouten, B., Calinescu, M., Luiten, A.
- Customer loyalty to a commercial website: Descriptive meta-analysis of the empirical literature and...; 2013; Toufaily, E., Ricard, L., Perrien, J.
- Discovering interest groups for marketing in virtual communities: An integrated approach; 2013; Wang, K.-Y., Wu, H.-J., Ting, I.-H.
- Multimode, Global Scale Usage: Understanding respondent scale usage across borders and devices; 2013; Pettit, F. A., Courtright, M.
- Insights into Action Profiling shopping occasions for retailers through mobile and online research; 2013; Churkina, O., Morris, T.
- Recent Experiences with Electronic Questionnaire Testing at Statistics Canada ; 2013; Lawrence, D.
- A nationwide web-based freight data collection; 2013; Samimi, A., Mohammadian, A., Kawamura, K.
- Use of a Social Networking Web Site for Recruiting Canadian Youth for Medical Research; 2013; Chu, J. L., Snider, C. E.
- P02.04. Internet survey confirms strong interest in Yoga among fibromyalgia patients; 2012; Carson, J., Bennett, R., Jones, K., Mist, S.
- Approaches to empiric ablation of slow pathway: results from the Canadian EP web survey; 2012; Laish-Farkash, A., Shurrab, M., Tiong, I., Verma, A., Amit, G., Kiss, A., Morriello, F., Singh, S.,...
- Biting the Hand and Bending the Rules: An IJMR Presentation; 2012; Pettit, A.
- Mixed Mode: Phone and Web Discussion on Efficient Strategies; 2012; Gagnon, M.
- Survey Quality; 2012; Lyberg, L. E.
- Adaptive web sampling in ecology; 2012; Thompson, S. K.
- Respondent-driven sampling; 2012; Schonlau, M., Liebau, E.
- Firefly Online Surveys: A fully featured tool for Web surveys and forums; 2012; Deal, K.
- Where is Neutral? Using Negativity Biases to Interpret Thermometer Scores; 2012; Soroka, S., Albaugh, Q.
- Online and Paper-Based: A Mixed-Method Approach to Conducting a Needs Assessment Survey of Physicians...; 2012; Olatunbosun, T., Wu, C., Grewal, G., Lynn, B.